Home > Agriculture, Funny science, SNP > Evolution


Recently, my attention has been caught by several interesting articles on evolution that (albeit must be taken cautiously), try to support new hypotheses on evolution :

Larson et al nicely  discuss a possible evolution of dog breeds in the light of results obtained with denser SNP chip.

Nature, spotlight Kevin Peterson’s work which use miRNA in phylogeny.

Both  articles point out the necessary distance one must have regarding informations in hand. As instance, markers or miRNA have certain properties (mutation rate, neutrality, abundance….) that should be taken into account as they will drive our conclusion in one way or another. Another feature nicely shown by Larson et al., is the parallel made between the molecular observations, our knowledge of “breed” history , and the probability that genetic events (bottleneck, admixture) occurred.

On another more humorous side, Brian Malow made some good points in one of his video…evolution might be “a slow process”. 😉

Categories: Agriculture, Funny science, SNP
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: